Rep. Jan Schakowsky Says Federal Repair Protections are ‘Critical’ in Letter to GAO

IL Senator Asks for GAO Study of Right to Repair

Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) wrote a letter urging the GAO to examine federal agency’s “efforts to ensure consumers’ right to repair” their vehicles.

Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), chair of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce’s Consumer Protection and Commerce Subcommittee, recently wrote a letter urging the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to examine federal agency’s “efforts to ensure consumers’ right to repair” their vehicles.

“When manufacturers take steps to limit repairs by consumers and repair shops, it can increase costs to consumers, unfairly advantage manufacturer repair shops over independent repair shops, and affect consumers’ rights. Robust protection of consumers’ right to repair is critical to counteracting these impacts,” said Schakowsky.

Rep. Schakowsky also asked the GAO to study and deliver recommendations geared at limiting unfair repair restrictions, which have skyrocketed in recent years. The move comes as automakers increasingly look to limit vehicle data access and misuse design patents to steer more business to their repair networks.

Read the full letter below:

The Honorable Gene Dodaro

Comptroller General

U.S. Government Accountability Office 441 G St. NW

Washington, DC 20548

Dear Mr. Dodaro:

Consumers rely on a range of goods every day—vehicles, computers, mobile phones, appliances, and more—to conduct their work, bring their children to school, and complete countless other tasks.

When these goods break, consumers sometimes face limited options on where and how to make repairs. For example, manufacturers can make repair manuals or diagnostic tools unavailable to repair shops or consumers. Manufacturers can also disparage independent repair shops or businesses that supply replacement parts to promote their own parts and repair networks—a practice that the Federal Trade Commission said has been associated with the auto industry. When manufacturers take steps to limit repairs by consumers and repair shops, it can increase costs to consumers, unfairly advantage manufacturer repair shops over independent repair shops, and affect consumers’ rights. Robust protection of consumers’ right to repair is critical to counteracting these impacts.

Industry innovations and economic changes have created new challenges for consumers to have the right to repair, in particular in the auto industry. In 2014, trade groups representing vehicle manufacturers, independent repair shops, and aftermarket parts manufacturers entered into a memorandum of understanding to create a broad right to repair in the auto industry. Under the memorandum, which many believe has been successful, vehicle manufacturers agreed to sell diagnostic and repair information made available to their dealers to car owners and independent repair shops.

This memorandum predated the use of telematics to wirelessly transmit vehicle data to manufacturers. In 2021, half of vehicles had such connectivity, and this number is expected to reach 95 percent by 2030. The data transmitted to manufacturers includes those used for diagnostic and repair purposes—potentially undermining the industry’s self-regulation of right to repair via the 2014 memorandum. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, responsible for vehicle safety, recognizes that vehicle innovations like telematics raise cybersecurity risks that can have safety implications, but has also indicated that cybersecurity protections should not unduly restrict access by independent repair shops.

It is critical that the Federal government ensure consumers have choice in how they repair their vehicles. However, as vehicle technology continues to evolve, ensuring consumers’ right to repair may be complicated by the intersection of other important interests, such as cybersecurity and the impact of copyright protection and exemptions.

Given Congress’s authority to regulate interstate commerce, as well as its role in providing oversight of Federal agencies, I would like GAO to examine the following:

• Federal agencies’ efforts to ensure consumers’ right to repair, with respect to passenger motor vehicles, including how agencies might balance considerations such as:

• Protecting consumer choice and ensuring competition in the repair market

• Addressing cybersecurity risks that may be associated with greater access to vehicle data and whether technology exists to ensure both data access and cybersecurity protections

• Addressing other potential barriers to a robust right to repair in the auto industry

• What is known about the impact and effectiveness of the auto industry’s self-regulation, particularly to what extent it has ensured consumers’ right to repair, demonstrated transparency to vehicle owners about their right to independent repair and access to their vehicle’s data, and how the industry’s self-regulation regime has adapted to and kept pace with advances in technology;

• What is known about the vehicle repair market for passenger vehicles, for example, the competitiveness of the repair market across the U.S.;

• Any recommendations to Federal agencies to ensure consumers’ right to repair based on GAO’s study of the issue.

You May Also Like

Maryland Teamsters Call for Passage of HB 1447

The legislation would protect middle-class jobs and motorist safety, according to the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

Maryland Teamsters Call for Passage of HB 1447

Members of Teamsters Locals 570, 639, and 922 testified before the Maryland House of Delegates to call for the passage of House Bill 1447 (HB 1447), legislation that would require a human operator in large commercial vehicles. Similar legislation has been introduced in California, Iowa, Indiana, and New York this year.

Beyond the safety aspect, the legislation would protect middle-class jobs, according to the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

$78B Pro-Business Tax Bill Passes House, Awaits Senate

The bill aims to reinstate tax incentives for R&D and small business investments, along with other measures.

MANN+HUMMEL NA Aftermarket Shows Right to Repair Support

Representatives from MANN+HUMMEL’s North American aftermarket brands recently visited Capitol Hill to express their support for H.R. 906.

MEMA Issues Statement on Tax Relief for Working Families Act

This measure contains the restoration of one year deductibility of research and development expenses, a key legislative priority for the association.

SEMA Urges Members to Support Tax Relief Bill

The Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024 benefits specialty automotive aftermarket businesses, according to SEMA.

SEMA Action Network

Other Posts

Majority of Independent Repair Shops View Vehicle Data Access as Top Business Issue

Eighty-four percent of independent repair shops made that claim, surpassing other timely considerations, like technician recruitment and retention and inflation.

Right to repair 2
Commentary: Right to Repair with LKQ’s Ian Musselman

Musselman says passing right to repair legislation is vital – for consumer choice, for independent businesses, for American jobs and for healthy market competition.

Commentary: Right to Repair with LKQ's Ian Musselman
Auto Care Voices Support for FTC, DOJ Comments on Right to Repair

The agencies asserted that renewing and expanding repair-related exemptions would promote competition in markets for replacement parts, repair and maintenance services.

bill hanvey right to repair
MEMA Aftermarket Provides Maine Right to Repair Update

MEMA opposes the Maine legislature advancing a law that would undo major parts of the right-to-repair referendum.

MEMA Aftermarket Recaps Maine Right to Repair Update