State Vehicle Inspections: Something Needs To Change

State Vehicle Inspections: Something Needs To Change

If states intend to run inspection programs, they need to be aware that vehicles are changing.

While everybody can agree that vehicle inspections are good in theory, no one can agree on the execution of a state vehicle safety or emissions inspection program. It is always a compromise between who is picking up the tab and if it is an election year.

I think it is insane that states are responsible for ensuring a vehicle meets hundreds of federal mandates for emissions and safety. Some programs have state-run stations that test everything from the horn to the brakes. On the other end of the spectrum are emissions-only inspection programs that are nothing more than an OBDII scan to verify if all the emissions monitors have run and no codes are active. 

If you look at the Pennsylvania inspection procedure, you will see the phrase “…unless originally designed to do so.” What does that mean? How is an inspector to know the exact amount of brake pedal travel or headlight output for a 15-year-old car? 

If states intend to run inspection programs, they need to be aware that vehicles are changing. California, Pennsylvania and New York will pass a car even if the ABS or stability control light is on. The reality is that ABS and stability control are no longer fancy options. Since FMVSS 126 and 135 were enacted in 2009 and 2012, these systems are standard equipment. Testing these systems should be part of the inspection.

What is even more annoying to me is how programs are funded. Where I live, we are subjected to Ohio’s E-Check. When it was first implemented, the cost to do an IM240 roller check was $10 to $15. Now, the test is free and is funded by the tobacco settlement fund. Isn’t that money supposed to go toward cancer prevention or teen smoking programs?

It seems to me that the process of inspections needs to start by inspecting the programs and who they’re intended to benefit and why. 

*Originally published in ImportCar.

You May Also Like

Time to Hit the Road

Outgoing AMN Editor Amy Antenora reflects on her time covering the automotive aftermarket.

Amy Antenora aftermarket news

Twenty years. That’s more than 5,000 business days, roughly 15 AAPEX shows (for me, at least), more than 400 executive interviews and who knows how many article posts.

That’s what my time here at Babcox Media, as Editor of aftermarketNews, looks like in black and white numbers. But that’s not the real measure of what I’ve accumulated over 20 years’ time.

‘The Aftermarket Should Not Fear the Future’

Paul McCarthy flipped the script on vehicle technology and its potential impact on the automotive aftermarket.

The Challenge of Organizational Culture, Post-Covid

The impact of Covid on our society and organizations will not be fully understood for many years.

Four Keys to Creating a Succession Plan That Works

Do you have a plan in place to ensure your business maintains its success after you leave?

Commentary: The Power of Team Spirit

Dr. John A Passante & Dr. Thomas Litzinger share their thoughts on the multiplying benefits of adopting a team spirit.

Other Posts

As Cars Keep Aging, What Will The Future Look Like?

The big issue for the next 22 years is how sensors and software that make driving safer impact vehicle serviceability.

Parts and Artificial Intelligence

In the past 25 years, things have changed with the Internet.

The Mission of Leadership is to Build a Learning Organization

Does your organization make space and time for groundbreaking ideas, innovation and inspiration?

Business Remains a Shared Experience

Relationships, facts, clear consistent communication and guidance are critical touchpoints with employees and customers.