Publisher’s Perspective: Extended OE Warranty An Attack On The Aftermarket?

Publisher’s Perspective: Extended OE Warranty An Attack On The Aftermarket?

Recently, General Motors announced it will be offering an extension on the bumper-to-bumper warranty that comes with new GM vehicles. This will, of course, include Chevrolet, Buick and Cadillac models. On the surface, it just looks like for a fee, new-vehicle purchasers can buy increased time and miles on their bumper-to-bumper, new-car warranty. I, on the other hand, see it as a potential negative for the aftermarket.

This certainly is alarming … You might not have caught this announcement, and on the surface it seems rather mundane and not really directed at the aftermarket. In fact, most that’s being written about it focuses on its effect on the OE dealers. I, on the other hand, see it as a potential negative for the aftermarket. Here’s what I’m talking about.

Recently, General Motors announced it will be offering an extension on the bumper-to-bumper warranty that comes with new GM vehicles. This will, of course, include Chevrolet, Buick and Cadillac models. On the surface, it just looks like for a fee, new-vehicle purchasers can buy increased time and miles on their bumper-to-bumper, new-car warranty. Here’s a more complete explanation of the action, as reported by Forbes: “The standard factory bumper-to-bumper limited warranty on Chevrolet and GMC products today is three years or 36,000 miles, whichever comes first. On Buicks and Cadillacs, it’s four years or 50,000 miles, whichever comes first. GM is now allowing customers to literally extend that basic warranty to five years or 60,000 miles (whichever comes first) for Chevrolet and GMC customers, and six years or 70,000 miles for Buick and Cadillac customers for between $1,000 and $2,000 that can get tacked on to financing.”

No big deal, right? Automobile manufacturers have been playing around with extended warranties as marketing tools for years. Dealers make money selling them, and only a percentage of people buy them. Why? Because over the years, buyers have become leery of extended warranties because they’ve been burned by covered-parts lists or warranty companies going out of business. However, this offering is different.

It’s backed by GM and it’s a bumper-to-bumper warranty. I find this threatening to the aftermarket on two fronts.

First, any vehicle repaired under this warranty will cause the labor revenue and associated parts costs and markups to stay in the OE channel. That means reduced revenues and parts sales for all of us. The more concerning issue for all of us is that it creates a pattern (or habit) of the vehicle owner returning to the dealership for service for a longer period of time.

This might not look like an offensive move to the naked eye, but if you get under the surface and see the real motivation for it, it is. When you couple moves such as this one with the data war that’s going on right now, this is an attack on the aftermarket business model. While we may not be able to control marketing plans by the OEs, we can assist in the fight over data.

The time is now. Get involved!

You May Also Like

Commentary: Right to Repair with LKQ’s Ian Musselman

Musselman says passing right to repair legislation is vital – for consumer choice, for independent businesses, for American jobs and for healthy market competition.

Commentary: Right to Repair with LKQ's Ian Musselman

This opinion piece on Right to Repair legislation and related issues has been provided by Ian Musselman, senior vice president of external affairs at LKQ Corporation.

Passing right to repair legislation is vital – for consumer choice, for independent businesses, for American jobs and for healthy market competition that helps keep costs affordable for Americans already struggling with sky-high car repair prices. As the REPAIR Act awaits consideration from the full House Energy and Commerce Committee after unanimous subcommittee passage, join the movement and call on your member of Congress to advance this much-needed legislation today at .

The Not So Electric Near Future

The public is overestimating the impact EVs will have on the car parc in the immediate future.

Charging Ahead cloud Theory
The Benefits of Reverse Mentoring

Organizations that foster a well-executed reverse-mentoring program experience multiple benefits including enhanced productivity, talent development and increased levels of retention.

Reverse-mentoring
Gratitude for YOU

AMN Editor Maddie Winer sends a holiday message of thanks to the aftermarket professionals who have inspired her with their tenacity, knowledge and the care they put into all they do.

No Escaping AI

Having conversations about how to implement AI responsibly in your business will pay dividends for generations to come.

Other Posts

Ziebart Unveils New Museum Exhibit for 65th Anniversary

Ziebart also announced new initiatives, including partnership agreements, a national advertising campaign and the brand’s first-ever mascot.

CCC Report Analyzes Labor Pressures, Vehicle Complexity

Report shows advanced technology is contributing to costlier repairs, higher claims costs and longer cycle times.

CCC Report Analyzes Labor Pressures, Vehicle Complexity
RNR Tire Express Honors Legacy of Franchisee Richard Rose

Rose was posthumously awarded with the franchise’s second-ever Lifetime Achievement Award.

RNR Tire Express Honors Legacy of Franchisee Richard Rose
TEXA Releases IDC5 CAR 76.5.0 Update

This software update enables more efficient troubleshooting, while enhancing existing special functions and topology module mapping features.