US House Subcommittee Holds Hearing On Self-Driving Cars

US House Subcommittee Holds Hearing On Self-Driving Cars

During the hearing, members addressed the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Federal Automated Vehicles Policy guidance issued in September.

The U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade recently held a hearing titled, “Disrupter Series: Self-Driving Cars.”

Capitol-Hill-StockThe hearing is the latest in a series that is examining the effects of federal policy on emerging technologies. During the hearing, members addressed the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) Federal Automated Vehicles Policy guidance issued in September.

Witnesses included:

  • Mitch Bainwol, president and CEO, Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
  • Dr. Mark Rosekind, Ph.D., administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
  • Gary Shapiro, president and CEO, Consumer Technology Association
  • Kirk Steudle P.E., director, Michigan Department of Transportation
  • Ann Wilson, senior vice president, Motor and Equipment Manufacturers Association
  • Laura MacCleery, vice president, Consumer Policy and Mobilization at Consumer Reports

In his opening statement, Subcommittee Chairman Michael Burgess, R-Texas, praised NHTSA’s proactive guidance on self-driving vehicles, but he expressed concerns about its implementation. Burgess stated, “Preemptive action on the part of regulators, before gaining a full understanding or appreciation of self-driving cars, may lead to unintended consequences that limit the capabilities of this emerging technology and its promised life-saving, economic and societal benefits.”

Rosekind commented, “As the Federal regulator with the responsibility of ensuring vehicles are as safe as they can possibly be, we play an important role on behalf of the American public to ensure that vehicle technologies do not present safety threats. Our policy is designed to promote the safe and expeditious deployment of new technologies that have the potential to reduce crashes and save lives … Our approach is not prescriptive. It does not tell developers how they must provide safety, but, instead, it builds a transparent and proactive approach to ensure that they are properly addressing the critical safety areas.”

Rosekind also stressed the adaptive nature of federal policy on automated vehicles, explaining that while the published guidelines represent NHTSA’s best approach for the time being, they were designed to be flexible – keeping in mind the ever-changing landscape of technological advancements. He also noted, in a response to a committee question, that the United States will have a “mixed fleet for a long time.”

Although that flexibility allows for a high degree of innovative freedom, one witness pointed out the complications of operating under imprecise guidance. Bainwol stated, “We believe that NHTSA struck the correct balance with respect to the proper federal and state roles that were outlined in the AV Policy Guidance. Simply put, the federal government [NHTSA] regulates the car, and the states regulate the driver via licensure, traffic enforcement and insurance. The distinction is not as clear with these new technologies … [which] creates friction between traditional federal and state responsibilities.”

The full Committee on Energy and Commerce continued its examination of evolving cybersecurity issues with a follow-up hearing later on Nov. 15, titled “Understanding the Role of Connected Devices in Recent Cyber Attacks.”

You May Also Like

SEMA Urges Members to Support Tax Relief Bill

The Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024 benefits specialty automotive aftermarket businesses, according to SEMA.

SEMA Action Network

SEMA is encouraging its members to reach out to their representatives and ask for their support on H.R. 7024, the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024. The bill, which The U.S. House of Representatives is expected to vote on this week, benefits specialty automotive aftermarket businesses, according to SEMA, by allowing for the immediate expensing of R&D and investments in equipment and increasing the small business expensing cap by nearly 30%.

ASA Endorses Bipartisan Tax Framework

The Automotive Service Association says the legislation is beneficial for independent automotive repair businesses.

Industry Partners Urge Congress to Pass R&D Deductibility Fix

“Congress must restore this tax provision to enhance U.S. competitiveness, job creation and innovation as soon as possible,” said Ann Wilson, MEMA’s executive vice president of government affairs.

Legislators Challenge Vehicle Data Access ‘Double Standard’

Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Pérez joined other legislators in sending a letter to NHTSA about proposed guidance for implementing the Massachusetts Right to Repair law.

House Passes Bill to Stop EPA Emissions Mandate

The U.S. House passed the “Choice in Automobile Retail Sales (CARS) Act” (H.R. 4468) with bipartisan support.

Opposition Grows for California’s Mandate Banning New Gas-Powered Vehicle Sales

Other Posts

U.S. House Schedules Vote to Stop EPA Emissions Mandate

The SEMA-supported bill would prohibit the EPA from finalizing federal emissions standards for light- and medium-duty motor vehicles model years ’27 to ’32.

emissions
Section 301 Tariffs & Circumvention: A Closer Look

There’s buzz suggesting that these tariffs are likely here to stay, possibly with even steeper charges on specific items.

Maine Voters Overwhelmingly Back Right to Repair

Over 80% of Mainers voted “yes” to ensure that they and their repair shops can access vehicle diagnostic tools and data.

AAPEX Keynote: Right to Repair Takes Center Stage

While there are headwinds, Congressional support is moving the REPAIR Act forward.

Right to Repair AAPEX