Analysis: Trump's Proposed Auto Tariffs Would Reduce US Auto Jobs

Analysis: Trump’s Proposed Auto Tariffs Would Reduce US Auto Jobs

A new analysis by the Peterson Institute for International Economics concluded that if Trump did carry out the duties, there could be a loss of 195,000 U.S. auto industry jobs in a one- to three-year period.

By BodyShop Business

President Trump has reportedly been considering raising U.S. duties to 25 percent on all automobiles and auto parts because of national security. A new analysis by the Peterson Institute for International Economics concluded that if Trump did carry out the duties, there could be a loss of 195,000 U.S. auto industry jobs in a one- to three-year period.

This analysis assumes that there would be no exemptions for any country (even NAFTA) and shows that the action could affect more than $200 billion in U.S. imports.

In addition, the report showed that if other countries retaliated with tariffs on the same products, a total of 624,000 U.S. jobs would be lost, and 5 percent of the auto and parts industries’ workforce would be displaced. This second scenario would hurt U.S. exports more, but total impact on the U.S. economy in either scenario would be small.

The Trump Administration and the Department of Commerce initiated a national security investigation on auto and parts products on May 23. According to the release, the results and recommendations are needed by mid-February 2019 but could be filed sooner.

Automobile imports alone that would be covered by the proposed raise in duties total $208 billion, and that’s not including auto parts. In 2017, the U.S. imported more than $143 billion in automotive parts, according to the International Trade Administration.

The report concluded that because the U.S. is reliant on imported parts and other inputs that aren’t produced in the country, and don’t have an easily made domestic substitute, these proposed tariffs would raise the cost of these parts and other domestic production costs. This would result in more expensive products for consumers and, in turn, create a lower demand for them. To read the full report, click here.

In response to this investigation, the Auto Care Association is seeking input and data on how imports of automobiles and automotive parts impact businesses and their customers.

The Federal Register notice outlined a comment and hearing process for interested parties to submit/present information pertinent to the investigation.

The Department of Commerce will recommend actions if it is determined that automobiles and/or automotive parts are being imported into the U.S. in quantities that threaten to impair national security.

Important dates:

  • June 22 – Due date for written comments, requests to appear at the hearing and a summary of expected testimony
  • July 6 – Due date for rebuttal comments
  • July 19-20 – Public hearing at the Department of Commerce (Washington, D.C.)

You May Also Like

SEMA Urges Members to Support Tax Relief Bill

The Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024 benefits specialty automotive aftermarket businesses, according to SEMA.

SEMA Action Network

SEMA is encouraging its members to reach out to their representatives and ask for their support on H.R. 7024, the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024. The bill, which The U.S. House of Representatives is expected to vote on this week, benefits specialty automotive aftermarket businesses, according to SEMA, by allowing for the immediate expensing of R&D and investments in equipment and increasing the small business expensing cap by nearly 30%.

ASA Endorses Bipartisan Tax Framework

The Automotive Service Association says the legislation is beneficial for independent automotive repair businesses.

Industry Partners Urge Congress to Pass R&D Deductibility Fix

“Congress must restore this tax provision to enhance U.S. competitiveness, job creation and innovation as soon as possible,” said Ann Wilson, MEMA’s executive vice president of government affairs.

Legislators Challenge Vehicle Data Access ‘Double Standard’

Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Pérez joined other legislators in sending a letter to NHTSA about proposed guidance for implementing the Massachusetts Right to Repair law.

House Passes Bill to Stop EPA Emissions Mandate

The U.S. House passed the “Choice in Automobile Retail Sales (CARS) Act” (H.R. 4468) with bipartisan support.

Opposition Grows for California’s Mandate Banning New Gas-Powered Vehicle Sales

Other Posts

U.S. House Schedules Vote to Stop EPA Emissions Mandate

The SEMA-supported bill would prohibit the EPA from finalizing federal emissions standards for light- and medium-duty motor vehicles model years ’27 to ’32.

emissions
Section 301 Tariffs & Circumvention: A Closer Look

There’s buzz suggesting that these tariffs are likely here to stay, possibly with even steeper charges on specific items.

Maine Voters Overwhelmingly Back Right to Repair

Over 80% of Mainers voted “yes” to ensure that they and their repair shops can access vehicle diagnostic tools and data.

AAPEX Keynote: Right to Repair Takes Center Stage

While there are headwinds, Congressional support is moving the REPAIR Act forward.

Right to Repair AAPEX